"The suit, filed in federal District Court in New York, claims that since August 2000 the defendants designed, distributed and promoted the LimeWire software and network for its 'superior infringement capabilities.' The defendants allegedly profited by receiving payments from third parties for advertisements, bundling third-party software with LimeWire, and a shopping function in LimeWire Basic software." [Billboard]
Comments (6)
Leave a Comment
PLEASE NOTE: If your comment does not appear immediately, it will show up shortly.
If anyone thinks You Tube is gonna be around in 2 years, they're dreaming.
Posted by Nate | August 4, 2006 4:11 PM
Difference is that Youtube isn't promoted as a service for violating copyrights. Limewire and Kazaa are.
Posted by Patrick | August 4, 2006 5:29 PM
Whoop de doo. Let's hope they don't have Soulseek in their sights next..
Posted by Richie | August 4, 2006 5:34 PM
break, youtube, revver, google video, veoh, vidking - i'm sure i left out a few - sure seem to be violating copyrights with tons of dare i write cool videos. what happened with napster will soon happen with vids
Posted by adminboy | August 4, 2006 11:30 PM
Youtube promotes and get hits for any video upload, from copyrighted videos to those not. Same as limewire...they are for legal file sharing and people share copyrighted material just like youtube. What is funny is material on Limewire, youtube, and myspace (which claimed ownership if posted, but recently stopped) increase awareness, acts as great advertisements, and increase concert attendance, and buying merchindise. Afterall, the artists make most of their money touring, and make pennies per record sold.
Posted by ash | August 4, 2006 11:31 PM
"Afterall, the artists make most of their money touring, and make pennies per record sold."
However, since recordings are typically financed by record companies who effectively loan money to the artists, once profitable recordings become a thing of the past, all artists (not just the few who have already) will have to find a new way to finance their recordings. (I realize that only a small fraction of recordings today are profitable, allegedly, but so far, those albums make enough profit to finance all of almost any given label's output.)
Posted by Anonymous | August 5, 2006 9:21 AM