« Beggars signed UK band The Early Years - NYC Tour Dates + MP3 | Main | the Brooklyn apartment where Biggie grew up »
Posted in NYC | music on January 5, 2007
Bowery Presents NON TRANSFERABLE tickets

After seeing how valuable their Arcade Fire tickets are, a few in the comments started asking what "non transferable" means. Bowery Presents has the answer (thx anon):
*ALL 5 ARCADE FIRE SHOWS ARE SOLD OUT*Looks like those wishing to spend too much money on ebay to get inside Judson Church would be better off spending too much money on the collectible postcard instead.
TICKETS ARE NON-TRANSFERABLE.
The ticket purchaser must enter the venue.
Copies of ID, Credit Card or Confirmation email
WILL NOT be accepted for entry. Only complete parties will be
admitted. No exceptions. Please DO NOT buy tickets on eBay,
Craig's List, etc. YOU WILL NOT BE ADMITTED!
---
Tags:
Posted on January 5, 2007 1:24 PM
Leave a comment
Powered by Ajax Comments
« Beggars signed UK band The Early Years - NYC Tour Dates + MP3 | Main | the Brooklyn apartment where Biggie grew up »
---
Comments (32)
amen!!
Posted by maria | January 5, 2007 1:46 PM
but wait...what if you had three or four tickets? Couldn't you just sell two and add them to your party?
Posted by clincher | January 5, 2007 1:47 PM
NICE!
Posted by danfun | January 5, 2007 1:47 PM
you could only buy two tix per night
Posted by Anonymous | January 5, 2007 1:52 PM
Yup.
Plus you have to figure real ticket scalpers are not going to the show themselves...although I guess for a really popular show, it might pay to buy two tickets for 60 bucks, sell one for a few hundred bucks, walk in the venue for two minutes then walk out.
I have to wonder also how this policy will work with the rich snobby types who will raise hell against the door people who won't him in with his printed out credit card reciept he paid 700 bucks for.
Posted by Reg! | January 5, 2007 1:55 PM
So what will happen to all those seats that scalpers bought and can't sell? Don't want?
Maybe the scalpers can be given amnesty and forgiveness...RETURN YOUR UNWANTED SEATS!..no questions asked
Hey AF....Keep us posted on the next round of legit sales.
Posted by Tiffany | January 5, 2007 2:23 PM
So what will happen to all those seats that scalpers bought and can't sell? Don't want?
Maybe the scalpers can be given amnesty and forgiveness...RETURN YOUR UNWANTED SEATS!..no questions asked
Hey AF....Keep us posted on the next round of legit sales.
Posted by Tiffany | January 5, 2007 2:23 PM
I just noticed the Bowery Presents website is showing listings for 2 Bloc Party shows in March at the United Palace Theater.
Posted by danfun | January 5, 2007 2:34 PM
nahhhh...scalpers are going to hang onto these tickets and just walk in with their "guests" and walk out.
Posted by littlebunnyfoofoo | January 5, 2007 2:39 PM
a friend found this one...any takers?
http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/tix/258064238.html
Posted by anyway you can get it i guess | January 5, 2007 2:44 PM
Bloc Party at the UPT?? I don't see anything about this show on Bowery Presents. What you talkin' about Willis?!?
Posted by jruth3 | January 5, 2007 3:01 PM
I also saw the Bloc Party info on bowerypresents.com this morning. Said tickets go on sale Jan 13th @ 11AM. Interesting that it has since been deleted...
Posted by C | January 5, 2007 3:10 PM
The tickets are being sold through Ticketmaster.
http://www.ticketmaster.com/artist/953414/?search_redirect=bloc%20party&tm_link=tm_header_search
Posted by danfun | January 5, 2007 3:12 PM
You know, while the Bowery did say "non-transferable" before the on-sale, didn't it occur to them that publicizing what exactly that meant BEFORE the frigging on-sale might have kept the vast majority of scalpers away?
The major problem here is the professional scalper companies, who have the technology (and warm bodies) to snag tickets for online on-sales. These would be the people selling tickets on Ebay even before the thing went on sale. Most of those companies would likely not have bothered if it meant paying someone to go to the show (even if only for a minute) in order to get the proceeds from only half the tickets they bought.
Think about it: Major scalping company buys up, say, one hundred tickets across all nights. Even if they got 20 tickets for each show in ten different names, that would be 10 people they'd have to pay to go to the show each night. No way they would consider that worth the trouble.
I love the policy, and it's very similar to what Springsteen does these days, but you have to make it clear up-front in order to keep the saclpers at bay and let fans buy the tickets. Yeah, it would have still be extremely hard and would have sold out in a few minutes, but normal folks would have at least had a real shot.
Just annoying.
Posted by Matt | January 5, 2007 3:16 PM
tickets.com is even worse than ticketweb. the ticketmaster service charge might actually be worth it at times if you get an application that can handle some traffic...never thought i would stand up for ticketmaster, but tickets.com SUCKS
Posted by seth | January 5, 2007 3:27 PM
The guy offering sex for tickets makes it seem like he has tickets in hand. I was under the impression this show was entirely will call
Anyone know otherwise?
Posted by klaus_kinski | January 5, 2007 3:42 PM
I've never been able to buy high-demand tickets on ticketmaster.
Tickets.com presented no problems to me.
Posted by Anonymous | January 5, 2007 3:48 PM
I blame the Arcade Fire. If they had not signed to that sadistic major label, Merge Records, they would not be as popular as they are now. That pompous, bloodthirsty capitalist Mac McCaughan and his faceless corporate staff can go eat it. Mac has absolutely no history in the indie world and only got into this game when the OC started making stars out of our circuit darlings.
Posted by trix are for kids | January 5, 2007 3:56 PM
"The guy offering sex for tickets makes it seem like he has tickets in hand."
His hand is certainly holding something, but it's not an Arcade Fire ticket...
Posted by Anonymous | January 5, 2007 4:01 PM
Does anyone have the presale info for the Bloc Party shows? I haven't received anything from the Marshalls fan club yet...
Posted by C | January 5, 2007 4:02 PM
That is a great policy for trying to get rid of scalpers, but sometimes people like to buy tickets as gifts, or legitimately can't go to a concert they have bought tickets for.
Posted by Kurt C. | January 5, 2007 4:51 PM
and what about people who don't have credit cards so their parents buy them the tickets?
Posted by Anonymous | January 5, 2007 5:03 PM
their parents have to go to the show too.
Posted by dad | January 5, 2007 5:16 PM
it can be a nice bonding experience for them
Posted by Anonymous | January 5, 2007 5:31 PM
i hope this is as much as a disaster as i think it's gonna be
Posted by Anonymous | January 5, 2007 6:23 PM
ah crap. just realized my kid bought tix for the vday show! guess i'm not getting laid that nite anymore.
Posted by dad | January 5, 2007 6:42 PM
Yeah I'm sure it's going to be a disaster. I'm sure no planning went into these shows at all. I'm sure the promoter and everyone involved are totally blindsided by the fact that Arcade Fire was able to sell out these shows. I'm sure it never even crossed their minds. I bet they announced these shows and booked them without ever thinking things out. I bet it will be complete chaos and the building will crumble to the ground. It happens all the time.
Posted by will | January 6, 2007 6:22 PM
Nice idea, but i question whether this policy is legal under new york state contract law, which allows consumers to transfer items, including tickets for fair value. No one wants to support scalpers, but god forbid i get sick and can't make the show, or one of my friends can't...why should Bowery reserve the inalienable right to dictate who i give my extra tickers to? This is a bit draconian, no?
Posted by legalist | January 7, 2007 12:19 PM
Good points all of em. I say everyone including those who bought tickets should stay home and let these pretentious f**ks play to 5 nights of empty rooms.
Posted by sergio | January 7, 2007 12:42 PM
hey sergio, why the mailice? last I checked they had shows and mp3 downloads making money for charities, I'm not sure if you actually know what pretentious means either. They would have to make claims about their own intentions or greatness or importantness or whatever in order to be pretentious, at best, they've joked about the hype surrounding them.
Posted by sergio's friend | January 7, 2007 3:44 PM
The thing that is not right about this policy is what happens if the ticket holder cannot make it for a legitimate reason. Case in point, recently, a few friends and I planned to go see a show at the Mercury Lounge. The day of the show, only a few days later, the person who ordered the tickets and had them at will call was really sick and could not make it. I called the Merciry Lounge to see what my options were since the others wanted to see the show. The person who answered (btw, was very mean and a total a-hole in case someone from there is reading) told me we could only get in with the credit card holder and there was nothing else. We ended up missing the show and losing the money.
That is why these measures suck. There is always cases of this happening.
Posted by Loop | January 7, 2007 10:54 PM
I wonder if we send letters to maybe the Attorney General's Office, they will look into this non-transferability issue.
Posted by Loop | January 9, 2007 1:58 PM