Posted in music on December 3, 2007

Feist arriving to the Letterman show

Feist is big. See her talk about it with Jon Pareles on January 12th in NYC. Tickets are on sale. Many other 2008 "New York Times Arts and Leisure Week" are on sale too (the shows that disappeared after I posted them last time).

On December 12th (exactly one month earlier) - Feist performs "1234" ON THE TODAY SHOW. That's her arriving her for Letterman in the photo above.

Comments (36)

She looks like a soccer mom.

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 5:45 PM

who the fuck would pay to see an interview?

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 5:52 PM

A little more bug-eyed, and she looks like the runaway bride, Jennifer Wilbanks.

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 6:04 PM

what a bunch of fucking whiners you are.

Posted by jonathan | December 3, 2007 6:24 PM

^^ perfectly stated

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 6:27 PM

She's hot and I would pipe her like there's no tommorow.

Posted by Domanick from Bensonhurst | December 3, 2007 7:03 PM

I'm pretty sure you're the only one complaining jonathan

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 7:16 PM

what gives?

i posted this

http://www.foxnews.com/images/161847/16_25_042805_wilbanks_jennifer_35.jpg

and it was deleted.

she does look like her.

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 7:54 PM

Is it easy to find a cab by the Bowery Ballroom after a show? I'm going to a show there soon and would rather take a taxi than subway back to Penn. Never been the venue, and haven't been in that area in ages, so I need some help.

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 9:28 PM

yeah cabs right out front on Delancy--no problem

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 9:34 PM

Why are most of the women of indie-rock not attractive?

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 10:43 PM

why do they have to be?
aren't they musicians not models?
and guys venerate them as hot even though they aren't really (compared to hot girls). maybe that is a good thing, it means people like them because of their talent?

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 10:49 PM

Everyone, let's ignore the troll who posted at 10:43!

Posted by Anonymous | December 3, 2007 10:53 PM

why are most of the megahot people in corporate pop music untalented?

Posted by eric | December 4, 2007 12:03 AM

Overall, I'm tired of white-centric would be 'indie-rock' blogs. click on the link for something that's happened outside of NYC, Seattle & Portland..

Posted by Deb | December 4, 2007 1:15 AM

i think she's beautiful

Posted by Anonymous | December 4, 2007 1:16 AM

Will Kevin Drew be there? I'd much rather hear what he has to say.

Posted by Christopher | December 4, 2007 7:35 AM

what time does daft punk interview?

Posted by Anonymous | December 4, 2007 7:43 AM

Good can, tight stacks. But she's no natalie merchant.

Posted by pshit. | December 4, 2007 7:55 AM

"i think she's beautiful"

Are you blind or do you just not get out enough? I am assuming you live in NYC if you read this site, in that case, just get out and walk around, tons of beautiful women in this city. Feist is just normal looking (teetering a bit on the ugly side IMHO), but in no way is she beautiful. Just go outside and look.

P.S. A women shouldn't be based on looks alone. Just saying Feist is not hot.

Posted by Anonymous | December 4, 2007 9:25 AM

Average soccer mom looks. Wrote a few decent songs. Makes a living from music. God bless her.

Posted by Wackamole | December 4, 2007 9:30 AM

Re: The guy two posts up.

How about you save your deep insights about the ladies until you figure out that whole singular/plural thing?

Mmmkay?

Mmmkay.

Posted by turd ferguson | December 4, 2007 9:55 AM

Re: The guy at 9:25.

How about you save your deep insights about the ladies until you figure out that whole singular/plural thing?

Mmmkay?

Mmmkay.

Posted by turd ferguson | December 4, 2007 9:55 AM

instead of judging her looks against shakira, why not judge her against women you could actually get.

does she look a bit better now?

Posted by jonathan | December 4, 2007 11:33 AM

Leslie Feist is physically attractive and the fact that she's an intelligent, interesting woman makes her even more attractive. The fact that folks are even arguing about her looks and not her talent is kind of sad. I hope she doesn't have to read any of the idiotic comments that some of you clowns posted here.

Posted by Jerry Koffman | December 4, 2007 12:23 PM

I wonder if she'll reveal in the interview why she left John Mason at the altar.

Posted by Anonymous | December 4, 2007 12:41 PM

Jerry Koffman is right on. Feist is an attractive, and talented woman, and this nit-picking dicussion is sad, and sexist.

Posted by A | December 4, 2007 1:46 PM

what's wrong with being sexy?

just kidding. the guys making those comments are pathetic.

Posted by om | December 4, 2007 2:13 PM

daft punk = hotter than feist

Posted by brooklyn poseur | December 4, 2007 2:16 PM

I think she looks cute in this pic

Posted by Anonymous | December 4, 2007 3:11 PM

Fear not Fiest, I would kindly offer you a hot vienna sausage injection. And I only listen to your music for the articles.

when is daft punk laying the pipe on fiest?

Posted by Halliburton | December 4, 2007 6:22 PM

I'll be in NYC when Feist plays the Today Show. Does anyone know if she has any scheduled public performances in NYC? I would love to see her!

Posted by jen | December 4, 2007 6:50 PM

1,2,3,4
Tell me I'm a dirty whore

Posted by Anonymous | December 4, 2007 7:01 PM

Brilliant comments, all! Such a creative display of vitriol does my heart proud.

Posted by Crosseyed Sniper | December 5, 2007 3:51 AM

If anyone is keeping count, put me down in the "she's not attractive" column.

Posted by Anonymous | December 5, 2007 8:56 AM

Let's set the record straight. Feist is thoroughly GORGEOUS!GORGEOUS!GORGEOUS! Then, add brilliant songwriting and good dance moves. She is the total package.

Posted by combinator | July 13, 2010 11:22 AM

Leave a Comment