Posted in music on April 24, 2008

As Conan points out, Radiohead are one of the "most environmentally conscious bands in the world." They just aren't as 'green' as Jack Johnson (or Dave Matthews or Pearl Jam) (according to Billboard)....

REcycle

Going green has become a focus in recent years for many artists who are trying to help save the environment with everything from carbon offsets, to giving away autographed compost bins, to philanthropy.

With Earth Day celebrated on April 22 each year to mark the anniversary of the modern environmental movement, music publication Billboard published a list of 10 acts that have tried to make a difference to the environment over the past 12 months: [Reuters]

Top 10 green artists:
1. Jack Johnson
2. Willie Nelson
3. Mana
4. Dave Matthews Band
5. KT Tunstall
6. Pearl Jam
7. Serj Tankian
8. Radiohead
9. Missy Higgins
10. The Roots

Maybe the list wasn't meant to be ranked from 'most' to 'least'. Either way, the article goes into more detail.

Comments (24)

how is Green Day not number one?
fuckers

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 10:45 AM

What about Green Jello

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 10:54 AM

Cee-Lo Green?

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 11:06 AM

I heard his farts were eco-friendly....

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 11:09 AM

and this is after dave's tour bus used a river as
a sewer...

Posted by anon | April 24, 2008 11:10 AM

Boston based post-rock band Constants modified a school bus to run on waste vegetable oil. They've also been doing it for years, as opposed to all the companies and musicians and people of the world that decide to give a shit about the planet for a couple weeks every April.

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 11:29 AM

who cares about green - i actually like the warmer weather. bring on global warming!

Posted by tim duncan | April 24, 2008 12:03 PM

This whole green thing is so trendy and most are just jumping on the bandwagon. mewithoutYou from Philly has been running waste vegetable oil (as I do) for years as well.

Posted by J | April 24, 2008 12:20 PM

J, (or others in the know)
just curious, but how does waste veg. oil emissions compare with diesel or gasoline engines?

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 12:28 PM

"just curious, but how does waste veg. oil emissions compare with diesel or gasoline engines?"

Well they make you hungry instead of making you sick...

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 12:39 PM

Who cares?

Hey, let's judge bands based on stuff other than their music!

Yay!

While we're at it, let's make a list of top 10 garbage men, based on how familiar they are with 14th century Danish painters... or top 10 animal-loving brain surgeons.

It would be about as worthwhile.

Posted by ZachForsbergLary | April 24, 2008 12:51 PM

That's absurd. How is it not worthwhile to care about a band's politics, views, philosophies, etc? Is it any different than caring about a writer's or painter's?

Posted by J | April 24, 2008 1:04 PM

The benefits of a conversion are more than economic. Vegetable oil is a renewable resource derived from plants, which by nature absorb carbon dioxide (CO2) during photosynthesis. Vegetable oil is thus “carbon neutral”--burning it merely releases stored CO2 back into the atmosphere and therefore contributes no new greenhouse gases to the environment. By contrast, burning gasoline in a traditional engine releases CO2 that had been stored underground in oil, and thus contributes to global warming. Vegetable oil also burns cleaner than regular diesel, spewing no sulfur and much less particulate and carbon monoxide.

Posted by J | April 24, 2008 1:07 PM

"Boston based post-rock band Constants modified a school bus to run on waste vegetable oil. They've also been doing it for years, as opposed to all the companies and musicians and people of the world that decide to give a shit about the planet for a couple weeks every April."

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 11:29 AM

Philadelphia based anarchist hardcore punk band R.A.M.B.O. did as well. And they are actually good!

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 1:34 PM

J, you are incorrect. By planting crops where there once were trees, you are losing significant carbon absorption. In fact, most biofuels require energy to convert into a usable form, thus negating any supposed carbon neutrality. Then there is the effect on the global food supply, which is currently resulting in massive rates of inflation for basics such as rice, especially devestating for the so-called developing world. Furthermore, there is no chance these fuels could ever replace coal and oil, neither could wind, hydroelectric, geothermal, and solar ever power our heavy industry. The answer, my friends, is nuclear power. Wow, when you tell veggie-headed liberals that the solution (or part of the solution) to global warming is a massive increase in nuclear power, they sure go bonkers. I've tried again and again to make this case, but they just won't listen. So cry over the dead polar bears, and move inland, my friends.

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 2:15 PM

That's nice, except for the fact that biodiesel is playing a major role in the skyrocketing cost of food all around the world which threatens to lead to widespread hunger and the destabilization of governments in the third world. Increased biodiesel use has also increased the rate of the destruction of the rainforest as more and more land is being cleared to grow soybeans to fuel Jack Johnson's bus.

There was a major cover story all about this in Time magazine about a month ago.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1725975-1,00.html

Posted by BK | April 24, 2008 2:15 PM

RIGHT ON! I HATE POLAR BEARS! but they're so cute!!!

Posted by stephen colbert | April 24, 2008 2:23 PM

There's something arrogant about that bus. You might as well should paint "ELITIST" on there ...... in watercolor of course, please, no noxious paints!

Posted by b.LOUD | April 24, 2008 2:27 PM

1. How is it elitist or arrogant?
2. Using waste vegetable oil for fuel does not skyrocket food cost. It's waste...aka trash. Growing plants specifically for biodiesel production does do that, but using svo does not.

Posted by J | April 24, 2008 2:30 PM

Oh, that bus!? Sorry. I agree. I thought you were talking about the waste vegetable oil busses that were mentioned.

Posted by J | April 24, 2008 2:31 PM

"In fact, most biofuels require energy to convert into a usable form, thus negating any supposed carbon neutrality."

Once again, I am talking about waste vegetable oil, which only needs to be heated. There is no conversion (except for rerouting your coolant system to an auxiliary tank holding the fuel).

Posted by J | April 24, 2008 3:06 PM

green river!!!

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 3:31 PM

willie nelson does use a lot of green products. heh heh heh

whatever--jack johnson is still the jimmy buffett of now.


Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 5:46 PM

Cloud Cult's self founded eco-friendly record label means nothing? as usual mainstream news is worthless.

Posted by Anonymous | April 24, 2008 6:56 PM

Leave a Comment