« STATS (formerly Stay Fucked) - free EP & a Brooklyn show | Main | Olof Arnalds playing Prospect Park w/ Blonde Redhead ++ more pics from MHOW »

Posted in music | tour dates on June 18, 2009

Walkmen, Grizzly Bear?, High Places & other bands playing the Guggenheim, Nico Muhly critiques NY Times review

by Andrew Frisicano

The Walkmen @ Sasquatch 2009 (more by Chris Graham)
The Walkmen

It Came From Brooklyn inaugurates a new series of live music concerts in the [Guggenheim] rotunda. The program will showcase ten bands over the course of five Friday evenings commencing mid-August, with each night featuring a music set by two bands, interspersed with a short reading by a Brooklyn-based writer or actor. The series, taking place within the rotunda, will cast a spotlight on Brooklyn's musical renaissance by providing a platform for a new crop of musicians. The line-up includes bands such as The Walkmen and High Places.
In fact, High Places and The Walkmen will play the same It Came From Brooklyn show, its inaugural night on Friday, August 14th. The Gugg website also NO LONGER reports that Grizzly Bear will be one of the series' acts. Stay tuned for more announcements.

UPDATE: We are told Grizzly Bear is not confirmed for this. They have been removed from the museum's website....

Those shows will be the second scheduled NYC gigs for both Grizzly Bear and The Walkmen (and only upcoming U.S. show currently for High Places). The Walkmen play a free show at the Central Park Summerstage with Dinosaur Jr. on Sunday, August 16th. Grizzly Bear will also play a free show, at the Williamsburg Waterfront with Beach House on Sunday, August 30th.

The museum's Frank Lloyd Wright-designed rotunda should add some interesting reverb effects to Grizzly Bear's harmony-heavy tunes. Especially good news if you missed the last three Grizzly Bear NYC shows, when they played May 28th and 29th at Town Hall and May 31st at MHOW.

Grizzly Bear collaborator Nico Muhly, who premiered a "scent opera" at the Gugg on May 31st and Jun 1st, recently defended the band's Town Hall show (at which he played keys) against the not-so-nice Times review...

Times: But wow, these songs are precious, and they occasionally came spangled with extras that made them even more so. The chorus was one of those elements, sorry to say.

Nico: Oh snap! Apology accepted. Now, I have major objections to the word "precious." It tends to be borderline homophobic in its coded usage, first of all, but second of all, it's a derogatory adjective with no alternative. It's reviewspeak. What I mean is: if you say, "that's ugly" somebody else can say, "no, it's beautiful." If you say, "it's over-stuffed" somebody can say, "really, I thought it was pretty thin." So the problem with a word like precious is that the scale of adjectives with "precious" on it belongs solely to the reviewer and is just a way of being mean. Case in point: this whole nonsense about Sufjan Stevens's's BQE Thing. Words like fey, twee, and precious have become these little nuggets of coded disdain, but they are really just useless self-congratulatory gestures on the part of the reviewer. What is the opposite of twee? Muscular? It all reminds me of the insane misogynist critiques of Jane Austen's novels. I guess the place for a word like that would be in a larger piece about the music world -- there was an enormous brouhaha in Iceland about the so-called Krútt scene. Krútt is probably the closest approximation in Icelandic of "precious" -- it refers to Múm, kind of Sigur Rós, and a lot of imitators: it denotes little bells, reversed glockenspiels, fairytale vocals, cutely-outfitted brass bands. Now, all of that is just a description and not derogatory; my iPod overflows with this shit. Anyway, to go to a concert of that kind of music and be like, "it's precious," all you're doing is going to a Chinese restaurant and being like, "wow, they were serving mad chinese food up in there!"

The full nearly-point-by-point analysis is up at his blog. David Byrne also recently took on a NY Times review on his blog.

All Walkmen, High Places and Grizzly Bear tour dates below...

The Walkmen - 2009 Tour Dates
Jul 16 Benicassim International Festival - Benicassim Festival Benicassim, Barcelona
Jul 18 Super Bock Super Rock Festival Lisbon
Jul 19 Union Park - Pitchfork Music Festival Chicago, Illinois
Jul 21 Turner Hall Ballroom - with Cass McCombs Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Jul 22 Mad Hatter Club - with Cass McCombs Covington, Kentucky
Jul 23 Beachland Ballroom & Tavern - with Cass McCombs Cleveland, Ohio
Jul 24 Lee's Palace - with Cass McCombs Toronto, Ontario
Jul 25 Mr. Smalls Theatre - with Cass McCombs Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Aug 14 Guggenheim Museum New York, New York #
Aug 16 Central Park Summerstage New York, New York
Sep 05 Electric Picnic Music and Arts Festival Dublin
Sep 12 Monolith Festival Morrison, Colorado
Oct 02 Austin City Limits Austin, Texas
# w/ High Places

High Places - 2009 Tour Dates
Aug 08 Off Festival Myslowice, Poland
Aug 14 Guggenheim Museum New York, New York #
# w/ The Walkmen

Grizzly Bear - 2009 Tour Dates
Jun 18 Tucson, AZ - Centennial Hall (w/ Wilco)
Jun 19 Los Angeles, CA - Wiltern (w/ Here We Go Magic)
Jun 20 West Hollywood, CA - Troubadour (w/ Here We Go Magic)
Jun 21 San Francisco, CA - The Fillmore (w/ Here We Go Magic)
Jun 22 San Francisco, CA - The Fillmore (w/ Here We Go Magic)
Jul 19 Chicago, IL - Pitchfork Music Festival
Aug 07 Osaka, Japan - Summer Sonic
Aug 09 Osaka, Japan - Summer Sonic
Aug 13 Olso, Norway - Øya Festival
Aug 14 Göteborg, Sweden - Way Out West Festival
Aug 15 Rees-Haldern, Germany - Haldern Pop Festival
Aug 16 St. Malo, France - La Route du RockFestival
Aug 18 London, UK - Koko
Aug 20 Hasselt, Belgium - Pukkelpop
Aug 21 Biddinghuizen, Netherlands - Lowlands Paradise
Aug 22 Glanusk, UK - Green Man Festival
Aug 30 Brooklyn, NY - Williamsburg Waterfront [free!]
Aug/Sept New York, NY - Guggenheim Museum
Oct 02 Austin, TX - Austin City Limits Festival


---

Recent Related Entries

Tags: bad reviews, Grizzly Bear, High Places, museums, Nico Muhly, The Guggenheim, The Walkmen

Posted on June 18, 2009 10:40 AM

Comments (49)

Cool! Walkmen will be great in that setting....

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 10:57 AM

"[Precious] tends to be borderline homophobic in its coded usage"

thats really not true. and i think he knows that, evidenced by the qualifiers (tends to be borderline).

also, jeez, everyone loves your band. this guy from the times doesn't. okay, welcome to life buddy. stop being so precious about it.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 10:59 AM

I thought precious was something to do with Lord of the Rings?

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 11:04 AM

Ben Ratliff and Jon Pareles are good critics.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 11:10 AM

The usage of "precious" is only homophobic in the sense that it was the name of Jame Gumb's poodle.

Posted by Feral | June 18, 2009 11:19 AM

EEEEEEKKK! This free, paying? Whatever! I'd love to see The Walkmen and Grizzly Bear there :)

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 11:31 AM

"Twee" and "precious" are not homophobic terms.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 11:32 AM

His defense of the review is the very definition of "precious." Never a great idea to respond to reviews.

Oh, and by the way: Nico MEHly

Posted by rajah of rehab | June 18, 2009 11:32 AM

Please unpack the coded usage of this critique:

Grizzly Bear fucking suck.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 11:40 AM

coded message: cerpvbhf

Posted by jerry yeti | June 18, 2009 11:51 AM

this guy, Nico Muhly, has a problem with reviewers using the word "precious," intimating (no, declaring) that it is a code word used by homophobes? in all seriousness, is this person insane? he clearly needs to be committed.

for him to suggest that a word like "precious" denotes disdain is mind-boggling. it's almost enough to turn one off to the music that this person is associated with before one even gets to hear it.

i've been quite interested in exploring the music of grizzly bear. but if their artistic expressions include such an ignorant twee individuals such as "nico" muhly, then i better re-think that musical foray.

MEH!

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 11:57 AM

it's precious how you can check out nico's "discographie" on his website.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 12:07 PM

God forbid someone call out the new Grizzly Bear album for being boring. It makes "Yellow House" look like "Fun House".

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 12:25 PM

This Nico guy is a fucking loser.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 12:34 PM

Nico is actually brilliant and his critique spot on . The Chinese food comment at the end made me lol and basically sums it up for me. Why go to a show to review music you already don't like? Makes no sense. It was a poorly written review of a fucking amazing show. Grizzly Bear are great musicians that care about putting on a great technically stunning show. If that "bores" you or makes you "grit your teeth" then fuck off and go to a hold steady show and shut the fuck up already.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 12:55 PM

People will be feel threatened by Nico and his comments because he's 100 x smarter and successful than all these commenters. Scoring the soundtrack to the reader, doing symphonies around the world. He's educated and outspoken and frankly really smart. This in turn, scares brooklynvegan commenters silly to the point where they just comment "this nico guuy is a fucking loser"

p.s Grizzly Bear are great, and the new album is way more interesting and exciting than Yellow House


Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:03 PM

oh so if I read Nico right, the fact GB is precious is a given and doesn't have to be stated. Its like going to a metal show and saying it was heavy (following his chinese food anology, which I guess means he really likes Chinese food). Grizzly Bear? more like Teddy Bear.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:06 PM

Yeah. Grizzly Bear? More like Yogi Bear.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:11 PM

so much hate in the world, so little time.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:11 PM

#1) nico is amazing and probably one of the most respected young modern classical composers operating right now (mothertongue is amazing).
#2) i think, while it might be a bit of a stretch, he presents a compelling argument.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:12 PM

anonymous 12:55 - "nico" is not brilliant. einstein was brilliant. and i guess, in YOUR universe, only shiny happy reviews are allowed. no negative criticism, heaven forbid! everything must be as perfect as the twisted hipsters perceive it to be. i suggest you grow up and expand your consciousness.

and anonymous 1:03? "nico" is not '100 times smarter' than anybody first of all (except, perhaps, you). what his childish diatribe revealed is his utter ignorance (about language, music reviews, life). he's traveled and scored symphonies and soundtracks? i know people who've traveled further and scored nothing more than a high score on a videp game who are more informed than said "nico."

nobody is frightened (let alone brooklynvegan commenters) by this person's whining. we are a bit amused by the ignorance of his statements, however, and the stupidity of his defenders.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:16 PM

i don't like led zepplin. i just don't. and i don't think robert plant cares, and doubt he would hold any ill will towards me because of my opinion. but this grizzly boy lowers himself by engaging with critics, some of whom are bound to not like his music. this doesn't mean his music is bad or he isn't a smart person or i am jealous of him. he should just stay above the fray and make more of his supposedly "amazing" symphonies and whatnot. do your thing, live your life, have fun with your fans. don't worry about the new york times. it's all good buddy boy.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:26 PM

1:03 Grizzly Bear is great. Singular. Thanks

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:44 PM

i'll be at the AC show in brooklyn instead

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:48 PM

>>"People will be feel threatened by Nico and his comments because he's 100 x smarter and successful than all these commenters."<<

Y'know why this comment makes me laugh so fucking hard? I've MET Nico, and while he certainly seems like a decent, likeable guy, I've felt more "threatened" by a tube of toothpaste. And my Lord, who the hell cares how "successful" he is?!? Is that your example of a demeaning remark?

Take a look in the mirror--that L on your forehead is getting larger.

Posted by rajah of rehab | June 18, 2009 1:53 PM

new york times loved grizzly bear at bonnaroo and BAM

ben ratliff is a chump. Nico is a sweetheart.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:54 PM

town hall shows were great= reviewer's a huge douche.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:56 PM

Animal COllective blew at bonnaroo, one should never choose to see them over GB

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 1:57 PM

i saw anco at bonnaroo and in a club a few weeks earlier. they werent as good at roo b/c the sound was fucked on the stage and it was during the day. i've seen grizzy bear 3 times and anco twice and would go to anco in a heartbeat over them. both great bands though.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 2:02 PM

never seen live music at the guggenheim, but if it's anything like their DJ events, well, that just a fucking shame.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 2:02 PM

Most musicians dont give a fuck, they have a take it or leave it attitude. but I guess Nico is think skinned....

also its not like NY TImes has an editorial policy on who they like, they have more than one writer covering music and im sure they dont all agree on everything.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 2:14 PM

"Why go to a show to review music you already don't like? Makes no sense."

Nononono. We need more of this. Please. Send critics to see shows by bands they don't like. Give critics albums by artists they don't like. I'm tired of reading the relentless critical cock sucking of Grizzly Bear (and I like some of their music). We need a broader spectrum of opinion out there.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 2:21 PM

"Why go to a show to review music you already don't like? Makes no sense."

One of the stupider things said on BV today at least. Yes, let's just send critics and writers to things they already like. It's a good way to foster a competitive marketplace. Grizzly Bear may be getting their collective cocks sucked by mainstream critics, but real music fans know they are just another boring as fuck "indie" band that is designed to appeal to pretentious white college students who think they know what good music is because they read Pitchfork (and Brooklyn Vegan).

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 2:32 PM

anon 2:32 made my point far better than i did (anon 1:16).

excellent comment regarding "pretentious white college students who think they know what good music is because they read Pitchfork (and Brooklyn Vegan)."

i will say, though, that BV is a great site while pitchfork should JUST GO AWAY.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 2:40 PM

anyone who thinks the word precious is homophobic is a fucking loser in my book. That goes for all the Nico apologists that are on his dick.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 2:49 PM

The only cretin lower than a critic on the douchebag food chain is someone who bothers to "respond" to a critic's review of their work that they disagree with (especially in such an asinine manner).

Note to Muhly: go suck Kanye's dick and get over yourself, assfuck.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 3:23 PM

everyone commenting on this thread is pathetic. Talented people make good music that people like, bored office drones in cubicles bitch and moan. Another day, another squadron of bitching by pussy anonymous assfucks. Go make a great album and link to it on the BV comments so we can all hear what great music REALLY is.

Tools

Posted by TRENT REZNOR | June 18, 2009 4:44 PM

actually the bitching and moaning is coming from the talented person making good music that people like. but i guess since he doesn't work at a cubicle he's cool and his opinion matters. seems a little messed up.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 4:56 PM

NIco isn't bitching and moaning. He's actually taking on a review in an intelligent interesting manner. I think he raises some interesting points.

Posted by No Homo | June 18, 2009 4:58 PM

anon 1:26! You don't like zeppelin? Shame on you!

Posted by JP Jones | June 18, 2009 5:05 PM

"The word 'homophobic' is gay."
- Anal Cunt

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 7:08 PM

grizzly bear, whatever

let's get down to a much better band. the walkmen. anyone think it's possible to catch both the animal collective show in prospect park (event time 5:30) and the walkmen?

hmm...guggenheim closes at 7:45 (and 5:45 on other days, including the friday this show is on...)

and animal collective will most likely play at 7:30 if there's an opening band...

thoughts? also wonder how much this walkmen show will cost when i can just opt for the august 16th free one.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 7:23 PM

the fact the that someone from the nytimes took the time to review a show s/he didn't like means that grizzly bear is big.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 8:54 PM

The "borderline homophobic" thing is pretentious bullshit, but everything else he said is pretty spot on. Most critics aren't really musicians, the way most book reviewers are writers, so they resort to meaningless flowery adjectives that are ultimately reflective only of their subjective, boring liberal arts grad perspective.

Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 9:05 PM

7:23 - by subway it will probably take you an hour to hour and a half to get there. If you get there by 9 you're ok by that time AC should be half way through. I might do that because i dont like AC anymore and I dont have a ticket but will go just to listen from outside then come here next day and talk about how much they suck.

Posted by Anonymous | June 19, 2009 1:16 AM

AC are horrible and meaningless live. They used to be amazing live (check out the recent box) but not for over five years.

Posted by Anonymous | June 19, 2009 10:27 AM

AC - horribly pretentious. At this point Id rather go see Tiny Masters of Today.

Posted by Anonymous | June 19, 2009 11:23 AM

$45? Whoa.

Posted by Anonymous | July 13, 2009 10:09 PM

Its hard to say anything good on this board without it sounding sarcastic but siren fest was off the chain. Such an amazing venue, great sound, and great linup once again.

Posted by Designer Wedding Gowns | September 12, 2009 1:58 PM

Leave a comment

Powered by Ajax Comments

PLEASE NOTE: If your comment does not appear immediately, it will show up shortly.
--

« STATS (formerly Stay Fucked) - free EP & a Brooklyn show | Main | Olof Arnalds playing Prospect Park w/ Blonde Redhead ++ more pics from MHOW »

---