Posted in music | pictures on March 5, 2010

by Benjamin Lozovsky

Animal Collective

"For the Guggenheim's 50th Anniversary, the band Animal Collective has collaborated with artist Danny Perez on a site-specific performance piece that will transform the museum's rotunda into a kinetic, psychedelic environment. Transverse Temporal Gyrus will feature original recorded music composed specifically for the event along with video projections, costumes, and props, rendering the band members and performers into intense, visual abstractions. During the evening, guests are invited to freely explore the space in order to fully immerse themselves in the environment created by Animal Collective and Danny Perez."
Chaos and abstraction found its way back to the Guggenheim Thursday (3/4) night. It had nothing to do with the recently finished Kandinsky retrospective though. Instead it was through Transverse Temporal Gyrus, an almost violently meditative sound and visual installation designed by Animal Collective and artist Danny Perez.

The event was part of the ongoing yearlong celebration commemorating the museum's 50th anniversary. While it's impossible to say what museum founder Peggy Guggenheim might think of such an experiment in spectacle, her track record of gracious support for establishment challenging mind-benders like Max Ernst, Paul Klee, René Magritte and Marc Chagall could be a telling hypothesis.

Animal Collective described their musical contribution to the collaboration as an attempt to mimic the cacophonous yet often unrecognized communication present in both the jungle and thriving urban landscapes. It turned out to be an accurate representation, even through the diluted prism of psychedelia that washed over the towering rotunda for the whole event.

Samples created and collected by the band alternately chirped and blared through the 36 speakers set up along the ascending spiral path, determined at random by a complex (at least complex-looking on a audio engineer monitored screen) computer algorithm. For three hours monastic chants, saw-tooth metallic grinding, and even snippets of recognizable melodic elements from the band's recorded work, among many other sounds, repeated and bled into each other as Geologist, Avey Tare, and Deakin (Panda Bear wasn't there) stood as stylized monstrosities surrounded by black lit, stone-like sculptures and metamorphosing crystal balls. For many attendees, it was hit or miss.

The always challenging and ever-divisive band managed to confound plenty of their fans during the event, but to be fair, a large amount had probably never witnessed a sound installation before. And even as far as sound installations go, it was at times underwhelming. It was perhaps better served as less of a revelatory art piece and more of a completely unique and relaxing way to view and experience one of the most beautiful indoor spaces in all of New York City. Watching saturated colors shifting in tones illuminate the high glass ceiling of the Guggenheim was easily hypnotic.

But as the initially strange noises became more familiar as they reoccurred throughout the night, the mood of the crowd grew more frenetic, as if to connote that more we are able to understand each other, the more confusing our world becomes.

And for Animal Collective, the installation at once seemed like a creative side-indulgence and a culmination of a career long objective: to completely remove themselves as individuals from the music they create, sitting back as prominent but ultimately irrelevant performance objects. With that sort of fulfillment of an artistic destination, Peggy Guggenheim would surely approve.

More pictures from the 2nd of two shows last night, below...

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Animal Collective

Comments (141)

Where's the art?

Posted by brussel sprout | March 5, 2010 2:55 PM

After reading a couple of reviews, I'm actually a little more relieved that I wasn't able to go. After being shut out of the initial tickets, I thought this would be a once in a lifetime event, not I realized it was not quite as momentous.


Looks like it would have been cool for about 10 min, or if you were under the influence of something other than alcohol.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 2:58 PM

"or if you were under the influence of something other than alcohol."

BINGO.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 2:59 PM

Seriously. Worst $30 ever spent.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 2:59 PM

I used to do a lot of acid and go to raves and stuff and I think back then this would have been an amazing night, but now... meh!

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 2:59 PM

it looks like there was a face painting booth. how fun.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:00 PM

all AC's side things are soooo overrated and a waste of your time and money.
the dj party, the film and this too.
the art was a HUGE fart !!
the "music was forgettable, the screenings a bore.
just the 36 speakers sound design for that space was fantastic.
not a good production on the museum part as well.
all in all, amateurs night.

Posted by me | March 5, 2010 3:01 PM

this. looks. terrible.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:01 PM

@2:58

I was under the influence of alchohol and other things...It still sucked.

The reviewer is right though that this was much better served in using A.C. as the backdrop to enjoying the Guggenheim and not the other way around.

BTW- You wouldn't have had to pay. The early show they just let people in who had a valid ID. They never checked a thing.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:01 PM

There aren't enough drugs in the world to make this seem tolerable

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:02 PM

"Where's the art?"
----
It's hard to hear a sound installation through pictures.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:02 PM

Controversial, in-depth analysis of why this sucked to follow in 5, 4, 3.....

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:04 PM

my god this looks bad. Animal Collective have their heads officially firmly placed up their own arses. Someone should seriously edit them a bit, this is getting ridiculous.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:08 PM

embarrassed for the people who paid for this. At least you got some free face paint right?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:12 PM

wow

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:17 PM

It is time these guys went away! Fakers

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:17 PM

It is time these guys went away! Fakers
-----
was the run of Sung Tongs > Feels > Strawberry Jam > MPP fake?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:19 PM

i went to the first show, i was just waiting for them at the end to be like "so how does it feel to be fucked outta $30". A.C. can suck it

Posted by luddy | March 5, 2010 3:23 PM

Campfire Songs, and Feels .. that was it for me.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:24 PM

I don't think AC have "their heads up their own arses". If you ever watch an interview or speak with them, they are the most humble normal dudes ever. The Guggenheim asked them to play a show, but they are on a touring hiatus from live music, so they decided to do this instead. They like to be as involved as they can in their projects, which is why avey/deacon/geo were the three masked dudes.

I'm not sure what people were expecting, but they clearly weren't aiming for the zenith of art in the last decade. Even ODDSAC, I think most of you indier-than-thou bloggers were expecting it to be some sort of breakthrough in surrealist art and film, but it really wasn't the goal of the project. They just wanted to put music through a visual filter via Danny Perez, and the finished product was actually pretty great. I went in with no expectations and was pleasantly surprised.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:28 PM

Thank fucking god my girl had a great sense of humor. This was probably a disastrous first date for someone.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:28 PM

i agree with all of you to an extent...but they pulled this off in 3 weeks

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:29 PM

Guggenheim billed it as a performance piece and it was just an installation. Resultingly, the crowd simply waited for the "show" to start, limiting anyone's ability to freely explore the space (the ground floor was packed with indian-style seaters, and the balconies were lined with people holding onto their spots like grim death.

If people had known it was just and art installation i think A) there would have been a lot less people B) people would have come and gone freely and it would never have been as crowded at one point in time.

that being said - the "art" was really weak. winamp has better visualization plugins.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:31 PM

Yeah, thankfully I could only get one ticket or it would have been a first date situation for me.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:33 PM

piggybacking off their name to sell tix for the gugg

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:33 PM

I get the feeling a lot of you don't go to a lot of DIY art installations. Buncha hipsters expecting to have their minds blown because the Animal Collective name was attached to it and coming up disappointed.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:34 PM

Guggenheim Mehseum

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:37 PM

I feel pity for all the (l)(p)osers who thought this was cool just because it was Animal Collective. It plainly sucked.

''Fuck Art, Let's Dance!"

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:37 PM

Guggenheim Mehseum

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:37 PM

I went to the earlier show not knowing what to expect and with no expectations. It was interesting for the first hour and it was definitely cool to just run around the guggenheim, but it did get repetitive and I left pretty early. not the worst $30 I've spent, but I would have felt better if it was $15

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:40 PM

Were there any Republicans at this? I am taking a poll.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:41 PM

Guggenheim houses about 1,000 ppl. - 2x shows - $30 a pop. $60,000 ain't a bad take for those animalistically collecting

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:44 PM

3:44 - not bad for one night's "work" of standing motionless

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:48 PM

3:37 - Exactly!

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:50 PM

3:44 - that's some bad math

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:52 PM

This wasn't free? People actually paid money for this? God lord, you people are gullible.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:54 PM

So all the "haters" that said this was going to be dogshit in the original thread were actually... *gasp* RIGHT?

Big effing shocker there.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 3:59 PM

I find it interesting that so many of you hate on Animal Collective yet you are always at their events and feel the need to weigh in on their every move. Seems like a double standard at best. Just move on and let the people enjoy.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:00 PM

"If you ever watch an interview or speak with them, they are the most humble normal dudes ever."

If I pay $30 for a performance, I better fucking not get "humble" and "normal."

Animal Collective may be nice guys, but they're not groundbreaking trailblazers - they're placeholders at the banquet of art.

Posted by Crosseyed Sniper | March 5, 2010 4:06 PM

Capacity was 1,500 for these shows, so figure more like $90,000 was made at the door.

Posted by anon | March 5, 2010 4:07 PM

oddsac sucked a major choner

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:08 PM

I heard they made $1 million at this event and didn't have to pay anybody. I saw the director of the Guggenheim standing in line at 5/3 holding a sack of cash and laughing about hipster fucks.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:11 PM

There's no 5/3 Banks in NYC, you country bumpkin.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:14 PM

No 5/3 in NYC? Sounds like your city is the bumpkin one.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:16 PM

It's easy to hate, harder to create.

Posted by Regular reader | March 5, 2010 4:17 PM

5/3 is the time signature of most Animal Collective songs.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:18 PM

Bumpkin moves to NYC (probably from Ohio), looks for 5/3 bank like he had at home, realizes there aren't any there. Later he gets to use this information to put down someone in snarky blog comments. Bumpkin feels a little better about himself.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:19 PM

I don't understand why fans can't be critical of a band without being called haters.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:20 PM

Bumpkin receives Blumpkin, feels better.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:20 PM

4:11 just outed themselves.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:21 PM

4:21 - OH NOESSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!11

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:22 PM

Maybe the point is, he's in Bumblefuck County and even HE heard that Animal Collective were laughing at the HIPSTERS. HA HA HA all the way to Ma's Olde Tyme Bank Shoppe.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:24 PM

I'm sure their 3-d Joseph Capmpell would be even better...same budget of course...Anti-Retro!!!

Posted by What Ailes Me | March 5, 2010 4:26 PM

Why do people from other parts of the country read & comment (negatively) on this blog? I wouldn't waste my time reading a blog about the music scene (*cough*...ha!) in Rapid City or Reno or wherever the hell you tossers are from. I'm sorry that you're stuck living in a double-wide with your folks, but seriously, get a life.

Posted by Brooklyn Born | March 5, 2010 4:27 PM

"The always challenging and ever-divisive band managed to confound plenty of their fans during the event, but to be fair, a large amount had probably never witnessed a sound installation before."

Yeah, audience. FUCK YOU if you don't get it. You've never been to a painting party thrown by a band that isn't actually playing at all in a museum? Psh, rookies.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:34 PM

I assumed that Animal Collective would go all out since they were able to "take over" the Guggenheim. Looks like they were either only able to do so much with the place or totally half assed it. Oh well.

Nice review though.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:44 PM

Portland, OR music scene is doing pretty great actually. And this blog posts music news and tour schedules, not just NYC info.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:45 PM

"It was perhaps better served as less of a revelatory art piece and more of a completely unique and relaxing way to view and experience one of the most beautiful indoor spaces in all of New York City." <<< This is right on. It was basically like being at the best bar in the universe, circa 3045.

Posted by assface | March 5, 2010 4:47 PM

4:34 - get your point - though this doesn't look much different from other art events i've attended.

and if you've been paying attention, you shouldn't have expected anything more from animal collective. even at their shows, they don't exactly go all at on the visual element. it's pretty half-assed there too - why would a one-off thing for a museum they're not affiliated with be any different?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:49 PM

I go to BoiseVegan.com and post shit about their bands all the time, actually.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:51 PM

This thread makes me happy

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:51 PM

For anyone who has actually seen a band play at the Guggenheim, you know it's just a gigantic echo chamber anyway. Once you get over how cool it is to be seeing a band in the Guggenheim, it kinda sucks.

Posted by Deb E. Downer | March 5, 2010 4:52 PM

"Why do people from other parts of the country read & comment (negatively) on this blog? I wouldn't waste my time reading a blog about the music scene (*cough*...ha!) in Rapid City or Reno or wherever the hell you tossers are from. I'm sorry that you're stuck living in a double-wide with your folks, but seriously, get a life."

Why do people from other parts of the country think 97% of people that live in New York are little else but cartoonish, deluded scumbags? Oh, right.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:55 PM

If you don't live in NYC, you live in a shithole. We really should secede.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:57 PM

i love AC but after seeing these pics & reading reviews I'm thrilled i didn't have $30 to blow on this.
i'd envisioned each level of the Guggenheim transformed into like a psychedelic forest on one level, outer space on another, etc..
like a tripped out multicolored/luminescent rainforest type setting basically.
maybe with like some disorienting 3-d shit throughout.
i dont know..
seems like with an opportunity to use such a cool space they could've done something more amazing.
still love their music

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 4:59 PM

I always thought being "cartoonish" was a good thing. BRB - I have some phone calls to make.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:02 PM

i'd envisioned each level of the Guggenheim transformed into like a psychedelic forest on one level, outer space on another, etc..
like a tripped out multicolored/luminescent rainforest type setting basically.
maybe with like some disorienting 3-d shit throughout.

--------------

why would you think this? they're a fucking indie rock band, not the Walt Disney Corporation.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:03 PM

$30?? Ahhhhhh...hipsters.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:05 PM

These are some good comments

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:15 PM

I don't think you can get any gayer than this.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:15 PM

Then you should have seen the inflatable boner that was at the warmup show. Luckily it was vetoed by their tour manager.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:17 PM

I don't think you can get any gayer than this.

-------

is that how you people talk in NYC?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:18 PM

YOU PEOPLE?!?

/riot

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:20 PM

Hisham was there

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:29 PM

NYC is just a bunch of guido jerkoffs

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:33 PM

Good call. Italian population is hovering at around 99% in NYC.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:38 PM

even on acid this was stupid

we got robbed

$30 and they didnt even check tickets.

screw AC, Perez and the gugg for ripping us all off.

that took a few hours to set up and they made a killing.

Posted by drew | March 5, 2010 5:39 PM

honestly for a band that is trying to represent something real they did a good job at taking a page out from the corporate handbook... using pr and tricky lingo to fool people into thinking they were going to something epic...fuckin bastards

Posted by L's r for Love | March 5, 2010 5:50 PM

That was Pitchfork (and the Guggenheim?) talking this thing up. What we got is exactly what I expected.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:52 PM

haha you are all idiots.
the band didn't get 100% of ticket money (for what ever genius thinks they made $60,000) if any at all. my guess is they didn't make a cent on this.
and it wasn't at terminal 5 , or roseland, it was at the f*cking guggenheim. duh.
if you have ever been to a performance piece you wouldn't be so upset... and as far as fakers?
yeah, you are right, the REAL bands who do it for the MUSIC and FANS, like fall out boy or greenday would def have the balls to do something like this...
see you guys at hot topic, and hope we arent wearing the same plaid shirt or fitted hat!
oops that would be embarrassing

Posted by jingo | March 5, 2010 5:58 PM

I took my date to the 9pm show promising it would be amazing. I was so embarrassed! Good thing we drove..we were so outta there by 10:15.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 5:59 PM

i had a good time. they probably couldve done more, but as someone said before it was pretty much on a whim

everyone who was expecting the performance of the century would obviously disappointed. i went in expecting to see cool visuals and hear some ambient stuff. thats what it was and it was great

same thing goes for oddsac to a certain extent.

as with anything, go in a with a clear head and open mind and you'll probably be a much happier person.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:02 PM

to anyone complaining about the $30 ticket price,

insurance costs for putting on a show inside an architectural landmark/museum are incredibly high, especially with alcohol served and a bunch of kids high as a kite on shrooms, acid, etc.

not to mention it was a one time only type of experience at one the the most beautiful buildings on the planet, not Total Slacker playing at Market Hotel.

It wasn't groundbreaking musically or artistically, but it was an interesting experience and at times pretty wonderful. I think you just went expecting a concert and you're upset by your own false expectations.

enjoy the surprises in life.

Posted by Jonny Leather | March 5, 2010 6:06 PM

it was good if you didn't expect anything good

nah mean?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:09 PM

well said jonny boy

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:10 PM

Most photos ever in a BV post. This took like 3 minutes to load on broadband!

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:11 PM

"Interesting" and "surprising": two words that might as well be battle cries for the aesthetically beaten sucker.

Posted by Crosseyed Sniper | March 5, 2010 6:17 PM

We hate it when our friends become successful.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:20 PM

"to anyone complaining about the $30 ticket price,

insurance costs for putting on a show inside an architectural landmark/museum are incredibly high, especially with alcohol served and a bunch of kids high as a kite on shrooms, acid, etc.

not to mention it was a one time only type of experience at one the the most beautiful buildings on the planet, not Total Slacker playing at Market Hotel.

It wasn't groundbreaking musically or artistically, but it was an interesting experience and at times pretty wonderful. I think you just went expecting a concert and you're upset by your own false expectations.

enjoy the surprises in life."

bingo. i dont think the band had a lot of time to throw this together, and at the same time i would argue that watching the crowd I had a pretty odd sensation people were expecting a bit more than they got. for a bunch of people too cool for school I'm really seeing a lot of assholey bitchiness here.
i have my qualms with it, but that doesnt mean that the guggenheim and animal collective are responsible for a bunch of uptight twenty somethings having a bad night. if you were there and you took the time to relax and unwind, it was pretty great actually.
hanging out with friends in the cathedral of sound that was the guggenheim amidst a day glo camp fire? badass.
also, how many of you guys have even been to the guggenheim prior to this event?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:40 PM

I just wanted to say that this thread is absolute internet GOLD.

Well done, trolls, haters, and lovers. Keep it up.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:42 PM

Awesome Pics!!

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:49 PM

Crosseyed Sniper,

I'll have a much more elaborate artistic assessment of the performance on artinfo.com on monday. I'll try to describe without adjectives such as interesting and surprising just for you.

—aesthetically beaten sucker

Posted by Jonny Leather | March 5, 2010 6:53 PM

u didnt take enough pictures, dude. & why no creepy upskirt shots? or portraits of a douche wearing his scarf like the gold medal of douchiness?

& why arent there more comments on this post?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:53 PM

also, no shots of ppl in facepaint. or closeups of the masks. i think u need to make a part 2 of this post. & seriously, u ppl have to start posting comments on this thing

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 6:56 PM

this was amazing!!!!!
the speaker system was awesome... it sounded like the building was being attacked by ghosts

Posted by jingo | March 5, 2010 7:13 PM

Building was attacked by ghosts. 34 casual ties. All was enjoyed by all. If you went and had a bad time you suck at enjoyment.

Posted by SD | March 5, 2010 7:23 PM

this looks awesome. right the fck on.

Posted by vinny | March 5, 2010 7:29 PM

I hate music so much!

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 7:47 PM

I did not go to this, nor did I want to. But anyone else think it is cool Deakin was there? Not cool that he was there, but cool he was with the band, perhaps he will be back on their next record?

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 7:54 PM

to the commenter who said that this was best enjoyed as a unique environment to hang out in, and the other one who said that it was like being at the best bar in the year 3000-whatever - you guys got it.

it was a god damn museum, people. how was this any different from paying your $20 to go see a featured exhibit at the MoMA? except here, the exhibit was massive and relatively more engaging and only happened for 1 night.

I admit that I spent the first hour hugging the wall with my friend, waiting for the 'performance' to begin - then realized like everyone else that this was it. but walking around was a unique experience. being there reminded me a lot of being at a rave, except in a really cool location.

but was it worth $30 or waking up at 10am that morning a couple weeks ago to buy the tickets? nope.

Posted by 55555 | March 5, 2010 8:06 PM

Great photography

Wonderful words

Always a pleasure seeing things from this photojournalists point of view...

Posted by Julian Mackler | March 5, 2010 8:15 PM

Who cares!!! My boyfriend thinks the same with me. He- is eight years older than me, lol. We met online at- A_ge_m_i_n_g_le @ c-o--m a nice and free place for Younger- Women and Older Men, or Older Women and Younger Men, to- interact with each other. Maybe you wanna check out or- tell your friends.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 8:37 PM

I thought it was pretty amazing. (Though I was pretty stoned.) The music swirled around and up and down the tower. There were different things that stood out depending on where you were on the ramp. There was wine and beer, and it was a really cool and mellow PS1-Warm Up type of atmosphere. Sorry if you were disappointed; it did clearly say that the music was recorded if you had bothered to read the website.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 8:58 PM

There is no debate. This was dumb and a waste of money. If you are going to charge 30 bucks and use an iconic space at least do something interesting.


Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 8:58 PM

ODDSAC=FLUFFSAC.

Posted by sandblast | March 5, 2010 9:49 PM

"This took like 3 minutes to load on broadband!"

Sucks to be you. Verizon Fios loaded it in less than 5 seconds for me.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 10:34 PM

whoa. seems like it was a unique experience. as such how can you judge it negatively, there's nothing to compare it too. i see nothing in the comments about the music. tell us about the music.

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 11:42 PM

Man I keep showing up in all these pictures taken from the event. I had a blast. At first I was disappointed but then it turned into the most psychedelic non-drug-induced experience of my life

Posted by Anonymous | March 5, 2010 11:58 PM

It looks like a queer and kinda hippy version of a Sunn show

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 12:45 AM

why are people getting so upset about the fact that it was an art installation? what did you go to THE GUGGENHEIM expecting? it's an art museum, not a concert hall. i'm glad i went there with some dose in my system and my expectations in check which is why i actually had a good time!

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 1:27 AM

Animal Collective:2000's::Emerson Lake and Palmer:1970's

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 3:13 AM

Yo i like the creeper pics of the couple makin it on the couch. tight angle

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 12:00 PM

3:13- You wanted Dirty Projectors for that analogy.

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 12:02 PM

oddsac was awesome, this looks pretty bad but im glad that they can still piss people off after mass appeal

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 12:19 PM

what ever

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 12:30 PM

I'm amazed that 100% of the people (whether present or not) who bitched about the event clearly did not bother to read the description provided by both the Guggenheim and Animal Collective. At no point did either party claim it would be a concert and it is clearly stated that it would "feature original recorded music composed specifically for the event." More to the point: arty/experimental band + artist + art museum = art event. All the rage and disappointment that resulted from misguided expectations is just laughable. It seems as though people have forgotten the band's roots and their predilection for the strange and unconventional. While they have gained a little bit of prominence on the global stage, it's clear that they are not making any easy overtures to the public ("Brothersport" video anyone?). As for the evening itself, those of us who did a little bit of homework and walked in with an open mind were treated to a very special site-specific event that had wonderful strains of Stan Brakhage and Matthew Barney accompanied by a swirling sound collage that accurately captured what the artists had set out to do. Worth every penny.

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 1:27 PM

55555, March 5, 2010 8:06 PM... WOW, you actually woke up at 10am on a Friday? I'm impressed.

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 1:32 PM

Hey AnCo Management (aka anon 1:27),

Shut up

Best,

anon 2:05

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 2:05 PM

I don't think you can get any gayer than this.

-------

is that how you people talk in NYC?

---------

Implying I'm from NYC LOL

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 2:14 PM


here are my thoughts. I did not go to this event.
1. The thing that would have been most annoying for me is the fact that it looks so extraordinarily packed. Makes it seem hard to enjoy the atmosphere.
2. the price was expensive but in ny EVERYTHING is expensive. You're spending over a thousand on rent and over 10 dollars for lunch everyday so what's another 30 dollars for this. The price of this is right in line with the price of everything else in ny. that's just the way ny is. Dont blame animal collective or guggenheim. It's the city itself. Sometimes its worth it and sometimes its not.
3. Brooklyn vegan and the photographer are both piece of shit pricks for posting the picture of the two girls kissing. Seriously. Why is their picture posted? How could the photographer not be embarrassed to take that picture? And BV should have recognized it was irrelevant to the blog post. (I won't bring up the couple on the couch because they went too far. The girls didn't.)
4. I wish there was a way to find out which people posting actually went and have a real, objective opinion, and which are just animal collective haters/negative people/guggenheim shills who are biased. And you can't trust media reviews since they don't buy tickets. They either go for free or their company pays for the ticket. If you're not actually paying money than you have less at stake

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 4:22 PM

^4.22, you sound like NO FUN.

dude in zebra mask, Awesome shirt!

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 5:05 PM

Buh. This whole thing eats my dick.

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 5:22 PM

@anon 4:22pm, chicks making out is hotttttt....ohhh yeah!

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 6:21 PM

Went to the early Thursday show and was amazing under whelmed. The energy was way down. The only pulse in the place was the anxious nature of the crowd waiting for something to happen. Looking back on the description I guess we got what we paid for but come on... how many of us that went to this thing with the thought we were going to get something TOTALLY different? I would still go to see these guys but in the future I will make sure they are actually putting on a concert.

BTW do we even know if they were actually there? Who were those masked men!

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 8:10 PM

"And you can't trust media reviews since they don't buy tickets. They either go for free or their company pays for the ticket. If you're not actually paying money than you have less at stake."

It's "then" not "than", and it was only 30 bucks, so let's not shit ourselves. The media can bash or love whatever they want, regardless of cost -- in fact, they're more clear-headed if they don't have to pay. Less of the whole "I payed money and I deserve exactly what I want" kind of vibe. But if you know anything at all about the "media", you would know that most blogs don't pay for much of anything, considering they don't make very much money themselves and are there to contribute to the documentation and hawking of cultural happenings so that people can come whine about it on their blogposts.

Just go research blog posts, and I'm sure you will find quite a few well-written objective articles that will give you an educated opinion (you won't find one on the fucking BROOKLYNVEGAN MESSAGE BOARD, so get over it). That's what google is for.

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 11:10 PM

This looks fucking horrible.

Posted by Anonymous | March 6, 2010 11:27 PM

yesh, this is the way we fuckin' talk in NYC- so blow us

Posted by Anonymous | March 7, 2010 12:31 AM

i think those masks look purty though. any MD recordings of the event?

Posted by annie momus | March 7, 2010 8:27 AM

I wasn't expecting a concert I was expecting a well though out, interesting, art exhibit. Instead I got a hastily produced , sometimes generic, art school party.

When you are allowed to utilize the Guggenheim you expect something a little more than "kinda unique" or "like a fun bar"

It's clear these guys shouldn't be doing art exhibits unless they are free because what we saw there was hardly art, it was self important noodling and some crappy screen savers projected on the wall with costumes made out of glue guns and tin foil and paper mache in 10 hours.

Yeah so they didn't have a lot of time to make it. If you don't have time to make something amazing don't make it. I wouldn't want to put something half assed forward and charge for it and neither should they, but they did.

Posted by Anonymous | March 7, 2010 11:35 AM

"dude in zebra mask, Awesome shirt!"
----------------------------

thanks! It seemed to be a bigger hit than the mask

Posted by drew | March 7, 2010 10:29 PM

i really enjoyed this! so much :) bummed so many people didn't..

went with a few friends, my girl and i eventually split off and just walked around, got a glass of wine, sat on the floor for awhile. it was really pretty and fascinating. and super cool!

the person who said

'if you were there and you took the time to relax and unwind, it was pretty great actually.
hanging out with friends in the cathedral of sound that was the guggenheim amidst a day glo camp fire? badass.'

.. i agree!

really wish there wasn't so much hating... on this website and in the community / scene / society / whatever in general. nothing positive comes of it.


.. and, i know one of the two girls kissing very well.. and i'm sure she doesn't mind her picture being here! i bet she'll get a kick out of it when i tell her haha

Posted by Anonymous | March 8, 2010 11:03 AM

osted by Anonymous | March 8, 2010 11:03 AM

Totally agree 100% with everything you said. It was so chill. I just got a custom poster made of the event to hang in my dorm, it looks incredible.

Posted by Glowing Shirt Guy | August 27, 2010 2:52 AM

actually its a very nice place to go to, those images are way cooler than last time I got there lol

Posted by best trading system | September 19, 2010 3:40 AM

Great pictures
they took a while to load on my pc butvery nice

Posted by Prestiti a Protestati | September 28, 2010 9:40 AM

What's Danny Perez's nationality?

Posted by Robert S | October 8, 2010 12:18 PM

Guggenheim billed it as a performance piece and it was just an installation. Resultingly, the crowd simply waited for the "show" to start, limiting anyone's ability to freely explore the space (the ground floor was packed with indian-style seaters, and the balconies were lined with people holding onto their spots like grim death.

Posted by فساتين | January 9, 2011 12:44 PM

Guggenheim billed it as a performance piece and it was just an installation. Resultingly, the crowd simply waited for the "show" to start, limiting anyone's ability to freely explore the space (the ground floor was packed with indian-style seaters, and the balconies were lined with people holding onto their spots like grim death.

Posted by منتديات | January 9, 2011 12:46 PM

Merci au propriétaire du site. Nice de voir les choses nouvelles et intéressantes pour apprécier un peu la matière, vidéos, photos et articles!

Posted by Beauty salon | May 11, 2011 5:49 AM

Leave a Comment