Posted in music | pictures on March 11, 2010

by Benjamin Lozovsky

Broken Bells

Broken Bells, the new collaboration between producer extraordinaire Danger Mouse and Shins leader James Mercer, did everything that was expected of them Wednesday (3/10) at Music Hall of Williamsburg. A roundly good thing, unless like most live music fans, you come to a performance expecting the unexpected.

For Mercer and Brian Burton (Danger Mouse's real name), it was only their fourth show (they already played LA, Paris and London) together after a whirlwind musical courtship and friendship saw them create a stunning record of golden nugget mining 60s pop and psych rock. Brimming with melodious texture and refined emotion, the self-titled album released the day before the show is nearly spotless and blatantly thought through. For the majority of their set at Music Hall, the same rang true. But in a live implication, that translated into sterile, almost medically scrubbed renditions of all the songs from their first recorded effort. It was no small feat to reproduce such a nuanced and instrumentally rich work note for note, and the musicianship all night was stellar. But rock concerts aren't held in ICUs; germs and other unaccounted irregularities are encouraged.

The venue was dark, with dotted, drug-induced projections making up the entire lighting scheme. The album certainly has gloomy leanings, especially in Mercer's sometimes tortured vocals, but there are also mounds of joy clumped in there. With the exception of the lead guitarist and bassist, it was almost as if the band was hiding their lack of sentiment, obscuring their unease with playing the music on purpose. It wasn't necessary; hopefully Mercer and Burton realize as more shows unfold that they are readily capable of playing with precision and thoroughness, and that their skill will only shine clearer with a little dirt thrown over their pristine looking glass.

There was some pleasant filth present though. Openers Plants and Animals plenty soiled up the venue with their exciting identity crisis of stoner sludge-rock meets tainted indie crooning.

And after completing their album, Mercer and Burton came out together for an encore and performed a brightly paired down cover of Neil Young's "Don't Let It Bring You Down," followed by full band cover of Tommy James and The Shondells' huge hit "Crimson And Clover." They were faithful to both songs while taking thrilling liberties, with Mercer and Burton even showing uncharacteristic smiles throughout.

Coming up, both Broken Bells and Plants and Animals are heading to SXSW. Plants and Animals play six shows including a BV day party. Broken Bells play one big official NPR one at Stubb's with Spoon (3/17), as well as at least two more that have since been announced. On Wednesday 3/17 they're also playing an AOL pop-up day show with the location TBA that day, and they were added to the T-Mobile/Mog party happening March 20th at the Mohawk with the Black Keys also on the bill.

More pictures from Music Hall below...

---

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Plants and Animals

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Broken Bells

Comments (21)

it was a great show. much better than i thought after a subdued album listen

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 2:37 PM

Please stop with the meaningless drivel and malaprops:
"Brimming with melodious texture and refined emotion"
"nearly spotless and blatantly thought through"
"their exciting identity crisis of stoner sludge-rock meets tainted indie crooning"

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 3:17 PM

from the jerk who said malaprops...get your own blog to voice your crappy opinion or shut up.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 3:21 PM

"Drivel and malaprops?"

Take it to the New Yorker, wordsworth.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 3:25 PM

Good review, I agree wholeheartedly with your feeling about concerts in which the performer strives to reproduce their albums exactly. However, in this case, since the songs were relatively unfamiliar, and the sound SO perfect and the playing so precise, I gave them a pass, and thought it was a stunning show.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 3:27 PM

Agree w the review and with 3:27. Well put.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 3:42 PM

PURLJAM MSG in may!!

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 3:50 PM

@ 3:17, you're the reason I don't read these threads. Even if you don't like a few bits or style of the writing, what point is it to give vapid criticism on a message board like this. I wish we could agree to discuss the music and not the writing or photos on this site, it's not why people come here... or maybe it is?

I don't know, every now and then I scroll down to a thread on BV to see if there's a good discussion, and I'm almost always met with people just shitting on one thing or another. BV has the most down-trodden, troll obsessed threads ever. I'm surprised the pharma companies don't advertise Anti-depressants on here.

IMO it was a great review. I like the BB album and have an idea for what to expect at a show. Thanks, Ben.

Posted by TB | March 11, 2010 4:18 PM

my contention is with the phrase "pleasant filth present." yikes.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 4:35 PM

"Openers Plants and Animals plenty soiled up the venue..."

Huh? Don't attempt clever wordplay if you haven't first mastered the English language.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 4:43 PM

I don't see anything wrong with either of those phrases. Why don't you just post your own unimpeachable review?

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 4:59 PM

4:18, Big vocabulary does not equal good writing. If you'd like constructive criticism, I'd say the writer should focus on figuring out what he/she would like to say and work on expressing it in the simplest possible manner. 3:17 was absolutely right, a phrase like "blatantly thought through" means absolutely nothing and is burdensome for a reader to have to sift through. Why not use "well thought-out," "masterfully constructed," "brilliantly conceived?" Clarity means much more than attempted cleverness to a reader.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 5:04 PM

i agree with 5:04, but at the same time this person is not a professional music critic, probably more a music fan. so why judge the writing?

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 5:13 PM

james mercer always sounds exactly like the record. it's just how he is. always was, probly always will be. that's why i stopped paying to see the shins live. but this new band is fucking awesome. wish i could've gone :(

Posted by Anonymehous | March 11, 2010 5:23 PM

I like the album. Sounds like an American version of Blur. Perhaps it's the residual effect of Danger Mouse's work with Albarn. Either way... good stuff.

The live show was a little stiff which is totally understandable. Sometimes bands change up tempos and make slight augmentations for their live performances as they play the material more and get more comfortable.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 5:43 PM

It wasn't necessary; hopefully Mercer and Burton realize as more shows unfold that they are readily capable of playing with precision and thoroughness, and that their skill will only shine clearer with a little dirt thrown over their pristine looking glass.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 6:28 PM

I think the writer meant by blatantly thought through that its patently obvious every little detail was accounted for on this record. And those aren't even big words.

Posted by Anonymous | March 11, 2010 6:35 PM

this is from their encore:
Neil Young's 'Don't Let it Bring You Down'

I think they did a great job

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkySV_Gr_f4

Posted by JJ | March 12, 2010 12:24 AM

This review was MADE for ripfork.com

Posted by Anonymous | March 12, 2010 1:05 AM

Guggenheim billed it as a performance piece and it was just an installation. Resultingly, the crowd simply waited for the "show" to start, limiting anyone's ability to freely explore the space (the ground floor was packed with indian-style seaters, and the balconies were lined with people holding onto their spots like grim death.

Posted by منتديات | January 9, 2011 1:23 PM

it makes no sense for them to deconstruct the entire TD North venue to play a show the next night ~50 miles south at an amphitheater (which probably would require a different stage setup anyway). They'd play Providence or Mohegan Sun before that (and I think those are both highly unlikely).

Posted by فساتين - ازياء | January 19, 2011 5:07 PM

Leave a Comment