Posted in music on June 25, 2010

Lollapalooza 2009 (more by Paul Birman)
Lollapalooza

"The office of Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan is investigating Lollapalooza sponsors C3 Presents and their partners for anti-trust issues stemming from the radius clauses that the Austin, Texas-based concert promoters impose on all of the artists who play the giant, three-day concert in Grant Park, according to numerous sources familiar with the investigation." [Jim Derogatis]
Basically, bands aren't allowed to play in the same general area, for a certain amount of time, before or after another show they have scheduled. This ensures that one show doesn't compete with the other. The article says that club owners in Chicago say that this especially sucks for them, because so many bands play Lollapalooza and the length of time Lollapalooza says the bands can't play is unfair. Lollapalooza (C3) says that's just how it is, and people who agree with them would say that bands have the choice to play Lollapalooza or not, and then can come back and tour through Chicago later in the year. The above-linked article by Jim is an interesting read.

Comments (31)

When will this happen to Bowery?

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 2:21 PM

This is considered anti-trust, but there's no problem with the Ticketmaster Live Nation merger? As Yakov Smirnoff says: "What a country."

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 2:22 PM

"pretty standard really"
wonder why the spotlight is on lollerpalooza

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 2:24 PM

because lolla's contract is ridiculous: 300 miles. it interferes with booking as far away as indianapolis, detroit and milwaukee.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 2:42 PM

"The controversial radius clauses prohibit Lollapalooza acts ranging from the top headliners to the smallest “baby bands” at the bottom of the bill from playing anywhere else in the Chicago area for months before and after their appearance at Lollapalooza in August. Sources have said that the most extreme of these clauses stretch from six months before Lollapalooza to three months after it, and that they encompass a 300-mile radius—which would include concert markets as far away as Milwaukee, Madison, Iowa City, Detroit, and Indianapolis."

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 2:51 PM

Then I guess these bands have a choice to make...

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 2:55 PM

Wonder if Tom Windish has anything to do with this?

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 3:21 PM

What I don't get, in light of this policy, is why so many Lolla bands are allowed to do other local club dates the week of Lollapalooza. If I really want to see Devo but don't wanna go to Lollapalooza, I still can, as they're playing the same week in a local club...as are twenty other bands. Makes no sense to me. Admittedly, these are Lolla-sanctioned "aftershows" (even though some take place before the fest), but the point is still that anyone can go to them without buying a Lolla ticket.

Posted by LKJ | June 25, 2010 3:26 PM

lawsuitapalooza

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 3:29 PM

Since C3 also does the Austin City Limits festival is the radius clause (duration/mileage) the same for acts that play that one?

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 3:31 PM

why worry? most bands playing get paid a generous sum to play the festival. stop bitchin

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 3:32 PM

i don't think anyone is concerned about the bands playing the festival anon 3:32. the lawsuit is on behalf of the venues that are unable to book any of the bands.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 3:35 PM

From the Sun Times interview:

Q: You could waive the radius clauses for all but, say, the top five or eight headlining bands each day.

Attal: So who is going to decide, “This band gets a radius clause and this band doesn’t?” You can’t do it that way.

What, Charlie Attal? If we can get a man on the moon and you can pull Lady Gaga then you can definitely do it that way. It's very clearly marked on their website who are the main headliners, the second tier, and the third tier. Green Day, Soundgarden, Strokes, Arcade Fire, Gaga, and Phoenix get strict radius clauses, the next tier gets a lighter one, and the third tier should not be allowed to play the surrounding area for two weeks before or after. The fact that Violent Soho, Javelin, The Ettes, etc. can't play a bar in Detroit in August is ridiculous.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 3:56 PM

they do make exceptions especially with smaller acts in the further away cities... they clamp down closer to Chicago with acts

I think the fact that an Austin based company books a Chicago festival rubs the locals the wrong way a little..

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 4:16 PM

bowery presents already does this. like a month window.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 4:17 PM

4:16 writes, "I think the fact that an Austin based company books a Chicago festival rubs the locals the wrong way a little.."

Who is saying this? I live in Chicago, and I can't think of anyone who cares where the booking company for Lollapalooza is located--or, for that matter, anyone who even talks about it. The booking company could be on the moon and Chicago would still get tremendous fiscal and cultural benefits from the festival.

Your speculation sounds logical to a non-Chicagoan, perhaps, but it just isn't the point here.

Posted by LKJ | June 25, 2010 4:55 PM

"What I don't get, in light of this policy, is why so many Lolla bands are allowed to do other local club dates the week of Lollapalooza. If I really want to see Devo but don't wanna go to Lollapalooza, I still can, as they're playing the same week in a local club...as are twenty other bands. Makes no sense to me. Admittedly, these are Lolla-sanctioned "aftershows" (even though some take place before the fest), but the point is still that anyone can go to them without buying a Lolla ticket."

-thos are shows that are booked BY the same company. so they control the bands plays and if they let them play another play, the company in question (c3), gets the money and the show and ticket sales after band's guarantee. SO, this means all the local promoters can't do the shows. they control the bands for months before and after the fest as well, so anytime they come through they either can't play or have to play a c3 show/venue. it's a way to control bands touring schedule. and since they book shows all over the country and can control 1/2 of tours and put out of business long standing venues in each city. it's the walmart model. and since the biggest agency in the world is partners on lolla, that means they're in each others pocket for tours/bands anyway.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 5:02 PM

Since C3 also does the Austin City Limits festival is the radius clause (duration/mileage) the same for acts that play that one?

ANSWER: even stricter I hear in austin, tx.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 5:04 PM

Who cares? Most of the bands that play Lollapalooza suck anyway.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 5:20 PM

5:20

That's not the point.

Posted by LKJ | June 25, 2010 5:48 PM

C3 is old piss flaps in Austin, they lost the new shine happening,
I mean who cares 3 cunt flaps about the Eagles...

Posted by Magic D. | June 25, 2010 6:25 PM

ACL 2011 - Phil Collins, Mike and the Mechanics, and Hall and Oates...

ACL = FAIL

Posted by Sugar Tits | June 25, 2010 6:29 PM

Anyone know what the Pitchfork Fest radius clause is? Funny that they are not mentioned at all as hurting club biz.

Posted by Anonymous | June 25, 2010 7:38 PM

The Pitchfork radius clause is, if I recall correctly the article I read this morning, no local shows two weeks before or after the fest. It's much more liberal than Lolla.

Posted by LKJ | June 25, 2010 8:08 PM

Okay, I was way off with the Pitchfork radius clause. Here it is:

Pitchfork:
Artist will not make a public performance or appearance in Cook County,
Illinois, 60 days prior or after the Pitchfork Music Festival. Artist
will not perform at any “festival” in the states of Michigan, Ohio,
Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota or Missouri 14 days prior and after the
Pitchfork Music Festival July 16-18, 2010.

http://leisureblogs.chicagotribune.com/turn_it_up/2010/06/lollapalooza-one-of-many-festivals-with-exclusivity-clauses.html

Posted by LKJ | June 25, 2010 8:10 PM

first chicago lolla was the best. it was all downhill after that.

Posted by Anonymous | June 26, 2010 12:07 AM

I was at a lalapaluzza concert once... But I don't recall much. Had the dank and the hackey sack on heavy rotation during much of the show.

Posted by Anonymous | June 26, 2010 3:25 AM

sxsw promoters used to do this too..or are they still doing this?

Posted by Anonymous | June 26, 2010 8:29 AM

ACL, also run by C3 does the same thing in Texas for ACL... about 300 miles radius clause, but they have let bands play closer with C3 approval.

Posted by Anonymous | June 27, 2010 12:05 PM

House of Blues has a 90 day radius clause.

Posted by Anonymous | June 27, 2010 12:07 PM

being investigated for anti-hummus issues

Posted by Anonymous | August 8, 2010 10:52 AM

Leave a Comment